Know what was modeled, what was observed, and what still needs documentation. A source supports only the conditions it actually addresses.Source review: September 5, 2026 · Not a product certification or project approval.
Engineering model
Thermal performance
R-42–R-50 modeled typical-framing performance equivalent—not a nominal R-value.
The two assessed 5.5-inch wood-stud clear-wall configurations model at effective R-20.48–R-21.07. The comparison uses R-19 fiberglass-batt wood and steel baselines, plus assumed, untested leakage and infiltration inputs.
Keep these limits attached
Not a spray-foam comparison, measured utility saving, or universal value for every system. Top and bottom framing are excluded from the clear-wall sections.
Indoor mold counts were below each home's same-day outdoor comparison. The approximately 45,000-sample reference set concerns chemistry, not mold counts or 45,000 unique homes.
Keep these limits attached
One-time observations—not mold-proofing, a health certification, or proof the panels caused the results. The written opinion describes opening, drying, and remediation. The builder later reported drying House3 with drywall in place using a fan and dehumidifier; the accounts differ.
The opinion identifies CCLI report CCLI-18-121 for axial, transverse, and racking/shear work. The underlying laboratory report is not linked here.
Keep these limits attached
No universal allowable load, wind speed, or project approval is established by the photographs or this summary. Project-specific sealed design is required.
Applicability depends on the exact product identification, thickness, density, protection, and installation conditions. The evaluation report is not itself the UL Listing/Classification report.
Keep these limits attached
Not an hourly ThermaTech wall-assembly fire rating. In-house demonstrations do not replace accredited laboratory assembly testing.
The report describes 366 linear feet of exterior walls, a three-person crew, and one hour of initial training.
Keep these limits attached
A single reported project—not a typical time, a guarantee, or total construction duration. The separate six-hour claim still needs its own dated job record.
They are not part of the documented performance claim set above. A disclaimer is not a substitute for evidence.
Wind-speed figures
The original dated planning calculation is needed before publishing a numerical wind claim. Site conditions, loads, connections, and engineering govern each building.
Six-hour setup claim
A dated project log must identify wall scope, crew size, site preparation, and the start and finish used for timing.
109 years combined experience
Dated team biographies and a documented calculation are needed to substantiate this total.
In-house fire demonstrations
Test A and Test B require the footage and dated records of the assembly, procedure, temperature measurement, duration, and observations. No fire-resistance rating is claimed.
Truss ties + exact steel profiles
The supplied truss drawing shows a connection concept but does not identify a complete connector and fastener specification. Confirm the approved detail before treating the animation as installation guidance.
Wood species, treatments + material performance
A rendering does not identify a supplied product. Claims about treated lumber, decay, insects, or fire performance require the exact product documents and applicable test or listing.
Claims + supporting evidence | ThermaTech Building Solutions
